U.S. Dollar Hegemony for Another Century - China
No Serious Long-run Threat - Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
has covered world politics and economics for 25 years,
based in Europe, the US, and Latin America. He joined
the Telegraph in 1991, serving as Washington
correspondent and later Europe correspondent in
Brussels. He is now International Business Editor in
London.
Dollar hegemony for another century
By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard (Last updated: October
21st, 2009)
Let me stick my neck out.
The dollar will still be the world’s dominant reserve
currency in 2030, sharing a degree of leadership in
uneasy condominium with the Chinese yuan. It will then
regain much of its hegemonic status as the 21st century
unfolds. It may indeed end the century even stronger
than it was at the start.
The aging crisis in Asia — and indeed the outright
demographic implosion in Japan and China, not to mention
China’s water crisis — will soon be obvious to
everybody. Talk of Oriental supremacy will start to
sound overblown at first, and then preposterous.
Japan is about to go bankrupt. It is on the cusp of a
fiscal crisis that will change perceptions of Asia
dramatically. The IMF says gross public debt will reach
218pc of GDP this year. This is compounding very fast.
It will be 246pc in 2014.
The Hatoyama government is spending as if there is no
tomorrow. It plans to issue ¥50 trillion or $550bn in
fresh bonds. I have no idea when this will spiral out of
control. It could take another two or three years. It
could start next week. Yes, I know that Japan has been
borrowing merrily at ever lower rates for 20 years
without the sky falling. The 10-year yield is 1.3pc.
What happens when it rises to global levels of 3pc to
4pc? People made the same sort of arguments about the
global boom before it suddenly tipped over.
This blog does not attempt market timing, nor does it
offer investment advice. But I am absolutely certain
that pundits consigning the dollar to its death have
missed an even more dramatic currency and debt story in
Japan. The yen will top ¥200 to the dollar before this
is over. Jim O’Neill from Goldman Sachs has already
begun to hint at this.
Apologies to readers who feel confused about my view on
the dollar.
I have written a string of NEWS pieces over
recent weeks quoting the currency experts and Asian
officials slamming America, or exploring the
dollar demise thesis.
People assume that I share these views. I do not.
Furthermore, I suspect that at least some of China’s
grumbling about the dollar slide over recent months has
been a ruse to lower the yuan (pegged to the dollar of
course) against the euro, yen, and even sterling. The
goal is to protect export margins. (Surely premier Wen
Jiabao knows that China’s $1.6 trillion or so invested
in US bonds is a sunk cost. Forget about it. The
holdings are the consequence of their own currency
manipulation in the first place.)
The fact that Asian central banks are accumulating
$600bn or more a year in reserves by running huge trade
surpluses is proof enough that their (mostly rigged)
currencies are undervalued by 30pc to 40pc against the
West. To that extent, I agree entirely with HSBC
currency guru David Bloom that this is untenable. If
these countries continue to resist currency appreciation
they will overheat and succumb to asset bubbles — if
they haven’t already in China.
Where I am less sure is that this will necessarily be
resolved by a falling dollar. The evidence so far is
that Asia will put off the day of adjustment as long as
possible because they are addicted to mercantilist
export strategies — and export oligarchs control the
political systems (bar Japan). In which case they will
lose competitive edge the old-fashioned way, by wage
inflation for year after year until the world comes back
into alignment. If so, the dollar will not fall at all.
It may rise.
Nor do I really agree that this is in essence a story of
the two sick sisters: Britain and the US.
They are certainly sick. But as readers know, I think
much of Europe is equally sick — Spain, Italy, Greece,
Ireland, the Baltics, are even sicker — even if the
lag-times are longer.
The IMF keeps telling us that
Europe has failed to come clean on its bank losses.
Germany’s BaFin regulator says the same thing. Are they
wrong?
It all has echoes of the early 1930s when the
Anglo-Saxons were crushed in the first two to three
years, and the French bloc was crushed over the
subsequent three years. What goes around, comes around.
Charles Dumas from Lombard Street Research says
Washington must be chuckling as the weak dollar gives it
time to rebuild America’s industrial core. The “inflationistas”
— ie, those convinced that the dollar is being debauched
despite the fact that core inflation in the US is
falling and that the M3 money supply is contracting —
are playing straight into the hands of the United
States.
Nobel Laureate Gary Becker told me a few weeks ago that
America’ spectacular gains in productivity – growing at
a trend rate of 2.25pc to 2.5pc — is laying the
foundation for a much stronger US recovery in the
long-term than most people seem to realize. Compare that
with 0pc to 1pc for the eurozone. In Italy it is
negative.
The UN expects America to add roughly 100m people by
2050, keeping its age balance in relatively good shape
through a mix of immigration and a healthy fertility
rate — now 2.12 live births per woman, still above
replacement level. This compares to: Taiwan (1.13),
Korea (1.2), Japan (1.22), Ukraine (1.25), Poland
(1.27), Spain (1.3), Italy (1.3), Russia (1.4), Germany
(1.41), China (1.77), Britain (1.96), and France (1.98).
Some of this data may be slightly out of date, but the
picture remains valid.
Professor Becker said a collapsing birth rate is
extremely hard to reverse, and the cultural effects are
insidious. Old societies are status quo. They are slow
to embrace new technologies. Young minds are the source
of hi-tech invention.
The EU is fully aware of the danger. “What is at risk in
the medium to long run is nothing less than the
sustainability of the society Europe has built and the
viability of its civilisation,” said an EU report
(initially suppressed) by former Dutch premier Wim Kok
as long ago as 2004. Nothing has been done since despite
endless warnings from the Commission.
China’s work force will peak in absolute terms in six
years, and then go into sharp decline. I have no idea
how people square this with claims that China will soon
replace the US as world hegemon. The stark reality is
that China will hit a Japanese-style demographic crunch
before it becomes rich. Sheer size will give it weight.
But mastery?
Of course, if the US were stupid enough to enact the
10-year spending plans projected by the White House —
with a deficit of $1.9 trillion in 2019 on Congressional
Budget Office estimates — the country will be ruined. I
do not think America has so far lost its senses that it
will commit suicide in this fashion. In any case, the
bond markets will react long before we get there. They
will force a change in policy. That change will imply
higher US savings, and less import growth. The export
surplus powers that live off America’s market are going
to take it on the chin.
At the end of the day, America is a unified nation
forged by wars, under the rule of law, with a (largely)
unifying language and patriotic creed, and one of the
oldest and most deeply-rooted democracies in the world.
As the Supreme Court demonstrated during Watergate, it
can break presidents who violate the law.
It is often stated that a currency reflects the strength
of an economy over time. Actually, it reflects the
strength of a society. Who really thinks that Europe’s
old-aged home is a better bet than America, even if they
can hold the euro together as the gap widens further
between Germania and Club Med? Or thinks that China’s
half-reformed Communist regime is ready for global
leadership. Remember the little girl in a red dress with
pigtails who `lip-synched’ the opening ceremony of the
Beijing Olympics? Believe what you will.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance...other-century/